Knowledge Strategy

CORRECTIONS to the KVC Workbook (Version 3.1)

3 Nov 2007  

Sharp readers of the KVC Workbook (Version 3.1) have spotted several typos:

  • Page 3, right column, 1st paragraph – change “necessary” to “necessarily”
  • Page 5, 1st line – change “rather” to “father”
  • Page 5, right column, 2nd paragraph – after “more”, insert “than”
  • Page 6, right column, 3rd paragraph, 6th line – change “the” to “to”
  • Page 7, 1st paragraph – change first “who” to “which”, and “their” to “its”
  • Page 10, 4th paragraph – after “of” insert “us”
  • Page 12, 2nd paragraph – change the second “do” to “conduct”
  • Page 23, 2nd paragraph – after “routinely” drop “and”
  • Page 28, 2nd paragraph, 2nd line – drop “we”
  • Page 30, 2nd line – change “know” to “known”
  • Page 32, 2nd paragraph, last line – after “$50,000” insert “car”
  • Page 40, 4th paragraph – after “company” insert “has taken”
  • Page 42, last paragraph – change “some” to “an”
  • Page 44, 3rd paragraph – drop the second “that”
  • Page 46, 1st paragraph – change “diagnosis” to “diagnose”
  • Page 62, 3rd paragraph – change “an” to “and”
  • Page 66, 2nd paragraph – drop second “you”
  • Page 74, 1st paragraph – after “way” insert “as”
  • Page 74, 3rd paragraph – change the second “your” to “you”
  • Page 79, slide fourth bullet – after “possible” insert “to”

Thanks, you know who you are!

 All of these (and more) changes are made in the new Version 3.2.


2 Responses

  1. For explaining “marginal utility” the concept of value usually refers to purchasing the same product – and how the price will eventually go down. [Using a c ar example] for a family of five, the value of their first car may be $50,000 (even if they only pay $25,000 for it) and the value of a second car may be $30,000, and the value of the third car may be only $25,000, and it’s now worth purchaing any more cars.

    Example 2: the value of a bottle of coke to a person stranded in the desert might be $1,000. That same person might only pay $300 for the next bottle of coke. And only $10 for the third bottle. After ten Cokes, the value of next Coke may be near zero.

  2. On page 34, you may want to rethink slide diagram and/or slide title.

    See “Competitive Advantage” pages 36 (including footnote) & 37.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

  • Tim Powell on Enterprise Knowledge: What is it?: ““Mindset, not toolset.” Well-said, Ovais. It’s a bigger challenge than it seems, due to these organizational domains/silos that must be…Dec 30, 15:35
  • Tim Powell on Generative AI: Toward a balanced view: “Thanks, Steve. I do try to steer clear of tech-speak and wishful utopianism, both of which can cloud actual understanding.…Dec 30, 15:31
  • ovais mirza on Enterprise Knowledge: What is it?: “This insightful analogy beautifully highlights the multifaceted nature of Knowledge Management. The “whole elephant” perspective underscores the need for cohesive…Dec 30, 05:52
  • Steven W. Giovinco on Generative AI: Toward a balanced view: “Thanks for this–well thought out and original. I too am extremely interested in GenAI, specifically as misinformation spreads…thanks also staying…Dec 6, 11:39
  • Tim Powell on A brief pause: “Thanks, Les. My frequent conversations with you over the past year or two has helped my thinking a lot in…Jan 15, 13:07